Reproductionists, if reproduction is true why dont we see transitional forms in baby development?

But we do!





First you have a zygote, then it becomes a blastula (once a lining of cells surroung the circumference), then it becomes a gastrula (once the endoderm forms from the folding of ectoderm starting from the blastopore upward)...








... oh wait that's right. You'll want a transitional form between the process of gastrulation won't you.





:(








++++++++++++





What about comparative embryology? How do explain the fact that a fetus starts out looking like a fish (with pharengial gills and everything) yet eventually such gills develope into cephalic cavities such as the ears and nostrils?Reproductionists, if reproduction is true why dont we see transitional forms in baby development?
I suppose next thing I'm gonna hear is that pregnancy is just an illusion. There is no baby inside, it's an illusion made by Satan. The pain of childbirth is just God's way of punishing women for believing they had a baby inside them. He then apologises for all the pain by delivering to them a gift of a son or daughter.





The baby doesn't come from inside the mother. God places him/her in the midwives hands.





Sorry, but I'm an eyewitness to the reality of it all, unless none of it was real, just an illusion from Satan.





((((hugs))))Reproductionists, if reproduction is true why dont we see transitional forms in baby development?
God is the only creator that I know of...
Do you even understand this question?
If there were no reproduction, every species on earth would have died out after its first generation. What are you talking about?





Is U/S a tool of the Devil because it could show you the transitional phases you're claiming don't exist? Apart from the blastocyst, morula, etc, phases, an embryo looks significantly different from a baby even halfway to term; you can't even determine gender before 12 weeks. Did you expect a human baby to look like a giraffe at some point?
homo superior exists...we just keep a low profile...
you mean evolution. lactose tolerance is due to evolution
Now now..we all know reproduction is the devil's work.
what?
Damn scientists, trying to pollute God's works with their crackpot theories. HE hand crafts each and every baby. Sex has nothing to do with it.
**brain fart**
Here's a funny article I found about the reproductionist theory, I think you'll enjoy.





http://scienceblogs.com/pharyngula/2006/鈥?/a>





Edit:


Oh, Yeah? Ummm...the ultrasound for me is just a tool. Nothing Satanic about it.
'Fess up. You're just haeckeling the creationists, aren't you?
Ha! You've never seen the beast they turn into during the terrible-two's or you would KNOW that's a transitional form!
Reproduction is not true. Infact I just split in two!
because it takes millions of years and an environmental change
Because we can't see the babies develop. They are grown in a lab by the Stork People. :)